Tuesday, May 16, 2017

A Case for the Cheap Sports Car

Way back in the 1990’s Porsches were expensive and slow.  Unless you wanted a convertible Porsche, which was more expensive and more slow.  Porsches were expensive because they had to be due to the incredibly inefficient way Porsche made cars.  This created unneeded complexity on the assembly line and resulted in cars no more reliable than the average upscale European standard.  Even though Porsche was able to shift every car built, it was at such a low-profit margin they were in fiscal trouble.  The severity of the problem led Porsche to ask a few former Toyota executives to help iron things out.  The solution, it turns out, was basically to start over.  So Porsche started over.

In order to sell cars they must be affordable, never a strong point for Porsche.  Replacing the 944/968 was paramount to the survival of the marque.  Mazda had shown that an affordable roadster was the hot commodity in the market in the 1990's.  Porsche could have cobbled together a cheap convertible from existing parts, but the boys from Toyota nixed that idea.  Instead, it would be a completely new car.  The Boxster, a mid-engine convertible, was inspired by the 550 spyder of the 1950’s. It was developed alongside the new 996/911 and used many of the same parts.  Same front fascia, same “fried egg” headlights, same interior, same controls, same instruments, same wheels.  The “affordable” Porsche would be just as attractive, sporty, and as much of a Porsche as the upcoming 911.  Except it would be a mid-engined convertible.  What could possibly go wrong?  Everybody high-fived and went to the bar.

When the Boxster debuted it was a hit.  An affordable Porsche, and a convertible too.  Sales were strong.  As a result, Porsche found itself pulling away from the edge of the bankruptcy cliff.  The future was bright.  Then a few months later the new 911 was launched, and everybody lost their collective mind.  It looked just like the cheap, slow Boxster that hairdressers and secretaries drove.  Never mind the fact that the 911 was designed first, and the front treatment that everybody loved during marketing seminars and styling research was given to the entry level model as an enhancement to the Boxster, not a detraction from the 911.  It didn’t matter.  Both the 996 and the 986 (911 and Boxster, respectively) suffered.  Porsche immediately restyled the front of the 911 for the upcoming turbo, and eventually applied that doe-eyed front to all 911’s, leaving the Boxster with its undesirable fried egg headlights.  Eventually, the 911 looked like a proper Porsche again, and the Boxster and Cayman established themselves as an acceptable entry level model, quite separate from the 911.  But the damage had been done.

So, what does this mean to us?  One thing; all this headlight drama has resulted in some very good sports cars with very bad resale values.  Decent 911’s go for $18k, and Boxsters for about a third of that.  I would advise against the absolute cheapest Porsche you can find, but for old worn out Miata money, you can have a Porsche Boxster.  Even a base Boxster has more luxury items than any Miata.  It also has those cool Porsche gauges, the ignition key on the left of the dash, and above all, a howling flat-6 right behind you.  And howl it will, because the base 200HP 2.5 is thin on torque.  But it is adequate for the job and is able to move the little roadster to 60 in about 6.5 seconds.  Remember, back in the 90’s that was fast.  The engine makes a marvelous noise, especially with a few strategically drilled holes in the muffler - so it can feel faster than it actually is.

While the base Boxster is a viable Miata alternative, the Boxster S is a real sports car.  For a few more greenbacks than the standard car, you get a bigger engine, three radiators, six gears, and a bunch more power.  You also get big red brakes and white face gauges.  For my money, it’s hard to do better than a 986 Boxster S.  The M96 is not the most reliable of mills, so plan on replacing the clutch, rear main seal, and IMS bearing upon purchase and every 60K miles thereafter.  The fried egg headlights and jellybean styling are attractive again, and with a cool set of cheap wheels, you would be hard pressed to do better for the money.  Ideally, you could pick up a really cheap S with a bad engine and swap in a used LS3.  It would nearly double your investment, but for used Camry prices you could have a true supercar, able to out-perform almost anything on the road.  Just don’t get too involved, because too much Boxster modification investment will put you in 996 territory.  It would not be hard to choose between a Boxster and a 911 if they were similar money.  The logical choice would be the 911.  But I still prefer the Boxster, if for nothing else than the fact that a 911 is more serious.  And to be frank, the Boxster is better.  It has better driving dynamics and balance due to its superior rear suspension and mid-engine layout.  It’s also lighter.  The interior is more befitting an inexpensive roadster than a luxurious GT.  And it always seems as if a 911 owner is compensating for some personal shortcoming, while the Boxster is just a cute little car that shouldn’t intimidate anybody.  So find a decent one and enjoy it.  At least until the fragile engine grenades.  When it happens, don’t say I didn’t warn you.

Sunday, May 7, 2017

The Stench in Existentialism


Something has been troubling me.  It is a quandary that my brain has not yet wrestled to the ground.  It is not a true existential crisis, I leave that stuff to the philosophically inclined, but it runs to the core of my values.  The question is a simple one - why has Ford built the Focus RS?

Of course, the sensible answer is “who cares” because when it comes down to it, who cares.  But I have to wonder what meetings had to take place, who put their career on the line, and why.  It’s not that I have anything against the little car, it is kinda neat.  It is simply the latest evolution of a long line of hot Ford’s from Europe.  There has always been a Focus RS, but never before in America.  The whole premise of a hot hatch is somewhat foreign to us.  In the United States of F150, we tend to buy trucks, sports utilities, and Harley Davidson’s.  Large, powerful, and somewhat excessive is how our tastes run.  And still, somebody thought it was a good idea to sell a 350HP hatchback in the land of the brave and home of the free.

But why, you may ask, is a person who drinks Mobil 1 for breakfast criticizing anything about the Focus RS?  It has 350 horsepower.  Ken Block helped develop it.  It has a drift button.  Surely I would be among the early adopters, trading in a homely WRX for a Miata blue RS.  And truth be told, I like them.  But there is literally an elephant in the room that can not be ignored.  Actually, it’s a horse.  How can anybody, in clear conscience, purchase a Focus RS when right over there is a Mustang GT for the same money?

Let’s consider the cars.  The Mustang GT is a stunning rear wheel drive coupe with decades of racing pedigree.  It has a high revving 32 valve 435HP V-freakin’-8.  With the performance pack, it has the same Brembo brakes, Recaro seats, and summer tires as the RS.  It is infinitely more engaging to drive.  It is much better looking.  It has a nicer interior with a better stereo.  It will retain its value better.  Strangers will regale you with Mustang stories at the gas pump.  Guys on Harleys will give you a thumbs up.  Girls dig it.  Meanwhile, the RS is a nice shade of blue.

In a world without the Mustang, the RS seems pretty awesome.  And that is the world in which it was conceived.  Europe has been largely Mustang free until last year, so Ford Europe developed products that might have been outshined by the lowly Mustang, had it been for sale there.  This has led to many very interesting cars, including the Focus RS.  It seems strange that we never had the chance to buy a Ford RS product until now, but in light of this comparison maybe it’s not so crazy.  But now that Europeans have the chance to purchase a Mustang, it makes the Focus RS seem utterly redundant.

Not that any of this matters in the least.  It makes no difference to me that Ford makes two similarly priced cars with similar performance.  I would not spend my own $35K on either.  I would get a 997 Carrera S.  So I would like to apologize.  Clearly, my advice is useless and your time has just been wasted.  At least I feel better about the whole thing.

Latest Ramblings

Service

The cam follower finds himself waiting on service this morning.  Naturally, I am talking about vehicle service.  Not for my own vehicle, I...